Which explains why a channel like MTV could not have been developed in the 1950s?


There was not as much interest in music in the 1950s as there was in the 1980s.


There were very few channels, so each provided a variety of programming.


In the 1950s, television was not sophisticated enough for musical performers.


There were not enough musicians to justify devoting an entire channel to music.

my best guess would be the second option

What does the history of music indicate about new technologies?


It often creates new ways to spread and share music.


Music is at the heart of most technological inventions.


There is little interest in finding new ways to share music.


Music has adapted to all of the technology that it is likely to.

Often when we are watching movies or television, we do not notice all of the sounds that the sound engineer has added. Why not?


Sounds are only added when a scene is not working well.


Sounds are not designed to be noticed or heard during films.


Most media do not need any additional sounds to be engaging.


When well done, they do not stand out and add to the experience.

Imagine that a sound engineer has been asked to produce the sound of a dog barking. Why would the sound engineer need to know the size of the dog and the circumstances to make it believable?


Most people can tell the breed of dog by the bark.


Small dogs have lower, deeper barks than large dogs.


Creating a dog bark sound is not the job of a sound engineer.


These factors would determine the tone and intensity of the bark.

What does the career of Louis Armstrong illustrate about him?


He was a very talented and versatile performer.


Jazz musicians could not find success in mainstream music.


Musicians can only succeed if they focus on one type of music.


The discrimination of the era made it impossible for him to succeed.

What do you think will happen to a work of art if one or two elements will not be utilized?​